CRAMBA: Pontiac Lake

For posting trail-specific conditions and problems

Re: CRAMBA: Pontiac Lake

Postby Di_bear » June 11th, 2012, 6:54 pm

trebron wrote:Horse $hit at miles 2,4,5 & 6

Di_bear wrote:Regarding my ride tonight, I almost ran over a little chippy who was hanging out in the middle of the trail. He looked distressed and wasn't moving, although he was certainly alive and breathing. He wouldn't move when I tried to guide him off the trail with my foot, so I got a piece of bark to use as a spatula and some little fat sticks to keep him on it. Moved him off the trail only about a foot and a half. I hate seeing stuff like that. :-(


one dead chipmunk aboot 1.5 miles in


:(
Di 2.0: Image
MCMBA Vice Chairperson

Moronacity | Michigan Mountain Biking
"He's like kryptonite to aluminum." - dirt
"There is a fine line between fearless and *beep* stupid." - Jerry68's wife
User avatar
Di_bear
 
Posts: 8376
Joined: September 4th, 2006, 11:09 am
Location: Mount Clemens

Re: CRAMBA: Pontiac Lake

Postby Di_bear » June 11th, 2012, 6:55 pm

dirt wrote:
Di_bear wrote: Most equestrians don't care how riding mountain bike trails ruins it for the mountain bikers.

Fixed that for you.

Di_bear wrote:The horse *beep* argument really isn't a good one. You need to give them better reason, such as the erosion issue, and the fact that the mountain bikers are the ones who pay for the trails *and* maintain them.

How about the "These trails aren't open to horse" reason? Should be pretty a pretty good reason.


...and how many times have you been persuaded not to do something because it wasn't allowed? Yes, I have something specific in mind.
Di 2.0: Image
MCMBA Vice Chairperson

Moronacity | Michigan Mountain Biking
"He's like kryptonite to aluminum." - dirt
"There is a fine line between fearless and *beep* stupid." - Jerry68's wife
User avatar
Di_bear
 
Posts: 8376
Joined: September 4th, 2006, 11:09 am
Location: Mount Clemens

Re: CRAMBA: Pontiac Lake

Postby dirt » June 12th, 2012, 9:18 am

Di_bear wrote:
dirt wrote:
Di_bear wrote: Most equestrians don't care how riding mountain bike trails ruins it for the mountain bikers.

Fixed that for you.

Di_bear wrote:The horse *beep* argument really isn't a good one. You need to give them better reason, such as the erosion issue, and the fact that the mountain bikers are the ones who pay for the trails *and* maintain them.

How about the "These trails aren't open to horse" reason? Should be pretty a pretty good reason.


...and how many times have you been persuaded not to do something because it wasn't allowed? Yes, I have something specific in mind.


What's your point? My comment simply is that rather the arguing the reasons that horses are bad for MTB trails, simply state "Horse aren't allowed on this trail"
Nick Shue
Big Ring Coffee MTB
The content of my posts are not the opinions of CRAMBA/IMBA, and should not be construed as such

I...completely...agree........with Nick. -Di_bear
I have problems with flakiness.. -Di_Bear
Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain.. and most fools do.
User avatar
dirt
Administrator
 
Posts: 6922
Joined: May 20th, 2003, 12:44 pm
Location: Mount Clemens

Re: CRAMBA: Pontiac Lake

Postby Di_bear » June 12th, 2012, 7:41 pm

dirt wrote:
Di_bear wrote:
dirt wrote:
Di_bear wrote: Most equestrians don't care how riding mountain bike trails ruins it for the mountain bikers.

Fixed that for you.

Di_bear wrote:The horse *beep* argument really isn't a good one. You need to give them better reason, such as the erosion issue, and the fact that the mountain bikers are the ones who pay for the trails *and* maintain them.

How about the "These trails aren't open to horse" reason? Should be pretty a pretty good reason.


...and how many times have you been persuaded not to do something because it wasn't allowed? Yes, I have something specific in mind.


What's your point? My comment simply is that rather the arguing the reasons that horses are bad for MTB trails, simply state "Horse aren't allowed on this trail"


I just assumed that wouldn't work since there are signs clearly stating that.
Di 2.0: Image
MCMBA Vice Chairperson

Moronacity | Michigan Mountain Biking
"He's like kryptonite to aluminum." - dirt
"There is a fine line between fearless and *beep* stupid." - Jerry68's wife
User avatar
Di_bear
 
Posts: 8376
Joined: September 4th, 2006, 11:09 am
Location: Mount Clemens

Re: CRAMBA: Pontiac Lake

Postby c0nsumer » June 12th, 2012, 8:06 pm

Di_bear wrote:
dirt wrote:
Di_bear wrote:
dirt wrote:
Di_bear wrote: Most equestrians don't care how riding mountain bike trails ruins it for the mountain bikers.

Fixed that for you.

Di_bear wrote:The horse *beep* argument really isn't a good one. You need to give them better reason, such as the erosion issue, and the fact that the mountain bikers are the ones who pay for the trails *and* maintain them.

How about the "These trails aren't open to horse" reason? Should be pretty a pretty good reason.


...and how many times have you been persuaded not to do something because it wasn't allowed? Yes, I have something specific in mind.


What's your point? My comment simply is that rather the arguing the reasons that horses are bad for MTB trails, simply state "Horse aren't allowed on this trail"


I just assumed that wouldn't work since there are signs clearly stating that.


You are conflating method (signage) with reason (horses not permitted).
Steve Vigneau
Big Ring Coffee MTB Racing
CRAMBA-IMBA Chairperson
River Bends Park Co-Trail Coordinator
MMBA Website / Forum Administrator

Unless otherwise stated the content of my posts are my opinion and should not be taken as the official stance of, nor representative of, the MMBA nor CRAMBA-IMBA.
User avatar
c0nsumer
Administrator
 
Posts: 7255
Joined: May 18th, 2008, 12:35 pm
Location: Shelby Township, MI

Re: CRAMBA: Pontiac Lake

Postby compacted_graphite » June 12th, 2012, 8:10 pm

To Builder Bill (Proud Lake and Milford Trail TC): There are HIPPA Laws (patient privacy) which will prevent you from getting a good update on your injured biker from Saturday. Any assistance rendered is certainly appreciated.
compacted_graphite
 
Posts: 57
Joined: October 21st, 2009, 1:17 pm

Re: CRAMBA: Pontiac Lake

Postby Critter7r » June 13th, 2012, 7:37 am

compacted_graphite wrote:To Builder Bill (Proud Lake and Milford Trail TC): There are HIPPA Laws (patient privacy) which will prevent you from getting a good update on your injured biker from Saturday. Any assistance rendered is certainly appreciated.



Well certainly, if someone here knows the guy that was hurt they can give a quick, "yes, he's going to be ok" without violating any privacy laws.
<> Chris <>
I live in Holly & ride my '02 FSR 26'er at Holdridge.
Critter7r
 
Posts: 843
Joined: November 9th, 2010, 5:24 pm

Re: CRAMBA: Pontiac Lake

Postby KLydesdale » June 13th, 2012, 10:54 am

compacted_graphite wrote: I saw horse leavings today on two mile hill, but I am not sure where they entered the bike trail.


Those horses could have come off the trail that connects the horse trail and the MTB loop right near the base of the two-mile hill climb. I don't know if that little section is an official trail or not but I have been on it both on foot and by snowmobile. The climb on the horse trail in that area is a rather steep, nasty, eroded fall line one. Perhaps some equestrians out there for the PLHA campout/ride who were not too familiar with PLRA and saw that climb and avoided it by continuing along the interconnecting trail to the MTB loop. I don't recall any signs indicating you're leaving the horse trail or entering the MTB trail (or vice-versa) at either junction points.
KLydesdale
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: June 20th, 2002, 11:15 am
Location: Clarkston

Re: CRAMBA: Pontiac Lake

Postby FREEDOM35 » June 14th, 2012, 10:26 pm

I agree that being confrontational with horsey riders will accomplish nothing. When I see them on the trail I am polite. After all, they are expending a tremendous amount of energy sitting atop their mobile couches that leave smelly piles at the tops of only the steepest of hills. Still, Pontiac Lake is still a mountain bike trail, unlike Proud Lake (a trampled lost cause to me).
No one likes to admit they ate nine cans of ravioli
User avatar
FREEDOM35
 
Posts: 46
Joined: March 8th, 2012, 10:47 am
Location: Commerce Twp.

Re: CRAMBA: Pontiac Lake

Postby str8flush24 » June 14th, 2012, 10:55 pm

Critter7r wrote:
compacted_graphite wrote:To Builder Bill (Proud Lake and Milford Trail TC): There are HIPPA Laws (patient privacy) which will prevent you from getting a good update on your injured biker from Saturday. Any assistance rendered is certainly appreciated.



Well certainly, if someone here knows the guy that was hurt they can give a quick, "yes, he's going to be ok" without violating any privacy laws.


I am no lawyer but I am pretty sure that only applies to people who provide medical care for him....Dr, nurse, etc. OP was probably looking for an update from Matt himself or one his boys...JMHO
User avatar
str8flush24
 
Posts: 343
Joined: April 19th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Most likely at work thinking about when I can ride next.

Re: CRAMBA: Pontiac Lake

Postby str8flush24 » June 14th, 2012, 10:59 pm

KLydesdale wrote:
compacted_graphite wrote: I saw horse leavings today on two mile hill, but I am not sure where they entered the bike trail.


Those horses could have come off the trail that connects the horse trail and the MTB loop right near the base of the two-mile hill climb. I don't know if that little section is an official trail or not but I have been on it both on foot and by snowmobile. The climb on the horse trail in that area is a rather steep, nasty, eroded fall line one. Perhaps some equestrians out there for the PLHA campout/ride who were not too familiar with PLRA and saw that climb and avoided it by continuing along the interconnecting trail to the MTB loop. I don't recall any signs indicating you're leaving the horse trail or entering the MTB trail (or vice-versa) at either junction points.


Definite possibility. I ran into them right before that intersection last year. After speaking with them I think they honestly had zero idea of where they were at.
User avatar
str8flush24
 
Posts: 343
Joined: April 19th, 2010, 12:37 pm
Location: Most likely at work thinking about when I can ride next.

Re: CRAMBA: Pontiac Lake

Postby Di_bear » June 15th, 2012, 9:35 am

compacted_graphite wrote:To Builder Bill (Proud Lake and Milford Trail TC): There are HIPPA Laws (patient privacy) which will prevent you from getting a good update on your injured biker from Saturday. Any assistance rendered is certainly appreciated.


This is only for medical personnel providing professional care while they're on the clock. It's patient confidentiality so patients feel safe going to the hospital or clinic for care, which is often regarding an embarrassing condition. HIPPA is nothing more than a law enforcing a law that was already in effect.
Di 2.0: Image
MCMBA Vice Chairperson

Moronacity | Michigan Mountain Biking
"He's like kryptonite to aluminum." - dirt
"There is a fine line between fearless and *beep* stupid." - Jerry68's wife
User avatar
Di_bear
 
Posts: 8376
Joined: September 4th, 2006, 11:09 am
Location: Mount Clemens

Re: CRAMBA: Pontiac Lake

Postby Builder-Bill » June 17th, 2012, 2:13 pm

Critter7r wrote:
compacted_graphite wrote:To Builder Bill (Proud Lake and Milford Trail TC): There are HIPPA Laws (patient privacy) which will prevent you from getting a good update on your injured biker from Saturday. Any assistance rendered is certainly appreciated.



Well certainly, if someone here knows the guy that was hurt they can give a quick, "yes, he's going to be ok" without violating any privacy laws.


WOW... Yes, I know about HIPPA... I was just asking if anyone knows the guy.. and can tell me general info....
like....
Is he OK...or Not.
Builder-Bill
 
Posts: 357
Joined: November 15th, 2005, 2:58 am
Location: Milford, Mi

Re: CRAMBA: Pontiac Lake

Postby Roy » June 17th, 2012, 7:12 pm

I lost this threads track. How did Di violate the HIPPA law by reporting on the health of a chipmunk?
:mrgreen:
I think that washed out fall line hill was one of the 2 Pukes traded off when the trail was divided up!

Roy
User avatar
Roy
 
Posts: 1296
Joined: August 14th, 2002, 10:04 pm

Re: CRAMBA: Pontiac Lake

Postby KLydesdale » June 19th, 2012, 10:12 am

Roy wrote:I think that washed out fall line hill was one of the 2 Pukes traded off when the trail was divided up!

Roy



Nope, the hill I'm talking about on the equestrian trail is not one of the old Pukes and was never even part of the official MTB loop out there AFAIK. Big Puke and Little Puke were actually quite a bit aways from the two mile climb area, more near Teggerdine Road in the area where the equestrain tunnel is.
KLydesdale
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: June 20th, 2002, 11:15 am
Location: Clarkston

PreviousNext

Return to Trail Conditions & Comments

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Feedfetcher and 2 guests