AllMountin' wrote:I rode this for the first time yesterday, clipped in, of course..
Of course! (Everybody else - don't even
think about doing this ... see below). Impressive!
AllMountin' wrote:I didn't even bother to inspect it, knowing the quality of Reid's work.

Okay, everybody else please inspect it for the angles and line before riding it. You may take for granted that (unless it has been sabotaged!) the boards are solid, nailed in, and that there are no nails sticking up through the deck.
AllMountin' wrote:I was expecting it to feel like a low speed wall ride, since that is what it looks like. I gave it a couple hard pedal strokes and figured I'd sail around it. It felt a lot different than expected.
It sure does, I found the same thing. Had I built this out of dirt it would be so easy to add some here, take some out there, and tweak it. But instead we get a technical rather than flowy line. Still fitting the overall concept of having character, though.
AllMountin' wrote:There is something about the way the angles manipulate the bike. I think it is more difficult than it looks, but rode it 4 times in total, without issue.
Glad to hear that you had no problems! I am planning to ride it a lot more and determine the best line for smoothness and then put an indicator on the deck boards, such as roofing shingles to indicate the path of the front tire (as with Pitchfork). No luck on getting roofing shingles yet, though. Since it is more difficult than it looks, I'm glad to have the funky entrance - it should keep the unsure off of it. No way I want an easy ramp to the banked corner ... (think
lemmings)