pongomoto wrote:this topic comes up every year.

utabintarbo wrote:pongomoto wrote:this topic comes up every year.
Is it ever resolved?

gossamer wrote:If it is for insurance costs then what about the sport and beginners insurance, and lets face it, if I get hurt racing, MY insurance will cover me, not USAC's.
utabintarbo wrote:gossamer wrote:
What does USAC really do for the rider?
Why do these races need to be "licensed"? Usually, licenses portent to ensure a certain level of quality or expertise on the pat of the licensee. That is obviously not the case here, given that you're likely racing next to the same guys you raced next to at the last non-USAC-licensed event. Or is the willingness to part with the $60 fee sufficient evidence of one's "expertise"?
jonw9 wrote:gossamer wrote:If it is for insurance costs then what about the sport and beginners insurance, and lets face it, if I get hurt racing, MY insurance will cover me, not USAC's.
The insurance isn't so much to protect you, it is to protect the organizers, landholders, and affiliated people.
If you get hurt, your medical will cover you, assuming you have it. The insurance company will probably try and get their money somehow. I know the even we put on last year, 50% of the income basically went to cover the required insurance policy.
kiloman wrote:utabintarbo wrote:gossamer wrote:
What does USAC really do for the rider?
Why do these races need to be "licensed"? Usually, licenses portent to ensure a certain level of quality or expertise on the pat of the licensee. That is obviously not the case here, given that you're likely racing next to the same guys you raced next to at the last non-USAC-licensed event. Or is the willingness to part with the $60 fee sufficient evidence of one's "expertise"?
Having raced 1/2 on the road and track I can definitely attest to the benefits of having a licensed category system through the upgrade process. You wouldn't want any joe schmoe to try and jump in a Cat 3 criterium for example. For Cat 4/5 road racing there isn't much benefit to having a license unless you aspire to move up. I'm not sure how the MTB categories compare, if Sport is equivalent to road 3/4 and Beginner is equivalent to road 5? MTBing is a different kind of racing so it makes sense that the licensing doesn't directly correlate to the road. I wanted to do the 20mi Expert race because 10 miles is just too short for a race, but since I let my USCF license lapse 10 years ago when I moved to Michigan and saw just how bad it was to ride on the road compared to say Maryland or Pennsylvania or Virginia, I got out of road racing. MTB racing will be more for fun since I don't aspire to Pro 1/2 but I am bummed that I would have to hold an annual license to race the longer races, even if I get my butt kicked, I would prefer to do the longer distances. Oh well, we'll see how I fare this coming weekend in Sport.
mr_opjones wrote:I knocked the wind out of myself once.
iamkickstand wrote:my weakness is scrubbing off drops on DH races and runs
paynful wrote:Dave... I don't know about you, but I had to submit a race resume to get my CAT 1 MTB license. So you can't just race any class.
I think that beginners should be free, but you should need a lisence for Sport and up.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests