Snooker wrote:Rode Proud Lake today for the first time. I've got to say that I was pleasantly surprised, especially the section southwest of the rr tracks, which I'd never explored before (loop 1?). Based on the areas that I'd hiked before, I thought Proud Lake would be a snooze, but I was wrong! Granted, the loops are short, but the singletrack through the woods sections is as fun as anything at Highland or Brighton. The loose babyheads (puppyheads? chihuahuaheads?) reminded me in some small way of West Virginia. Ok, maybe that's a slight overstatement, but it was fun to be surprised by a trail that is listed as "easy" and that I had never considered as anything more than a good place to run the dogs. I actually had to walk a couple of climbs on my 33x16 ss.
Snooker wrote:Rode Proud Lake today for the first time. I've got to say that I was pleasantly surprised, especially the section southwest of the rr tracks, which I'd never explored before (loop 1?). ...
Snooker wrote:Has there been much conflict between horseriders and mtbrs at Proud Lake? I'm from Akron/Cleveland Ohio, and we're currently pushing hard to open up the vast system of parklands in our area to mt. biking. Like the western detroit suburbs, there is a big population of horseriders. One of the concerns of land managers is the possible conflict that would be created.
J/C wrote:Snooker wrote:Has there been much conflict between horseriders and mtbrs at Proud Lake? I'm from Akron/Cleveland Ohio, and we're currently pushing hard to open up the vast system of parklands in our area to mt. biking. Like the western detroit suburbs, there is a big population of horseriders. One of the concerns of land managers is the possible conflict that would be created.
In my experience over the last 2-3 years, no, there really hasn't been any conflict between equestrians, cyclists and hikers. Both bike and horse traffic is pretty low though. If you can, it's best to create separate trail systems. That will probably mean cyclists will have to build new trails. A lot of work, yes, but you'll get trails with better flow. Horse hooves chew up the trail tread and leave it rough so it feels like you're on cobblestones. Not to mention the manure. In your case, it might be necessary to share the trails for a time. If conflicts become an issue, that could provide the impetus for allowing mtn. bikers to build their own trails. Conflict to me doesn't mean people arguing with each other or an actual collision. If bikes and horses have frequent encounters on the trail, it increases the risk that a horse could become startled, which could be a safety issue for horse, rider and anyone nearby. Highland Rec Area is good example of separate trail systems working well.
On that note, Sunday, September 25, the equestrian group Proud Lake Trail Riders is having a Proud Lake/Kensington Tour the Trails Ride 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. If you ride that day, I'd suggest avoiding Proud Lake.
Spinwheel wrote:L3 has a tree down 100 yds after the H2O pump - it can be ridden around though. Another low hanger within a half mile after that - EZ ride under.
L4 has one down / vine covered about 1/3 mile before the right turn toward the Kens. Connector (needs chainsaw) ...another ride-over somewhere after that.
Lots of sticks down on all loops and some small trees blown over - I cleared a few.
Return to Trail Conditions & Comments
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests