jfactor! wrote:I know I'm going to catchfor this. LOL!!!
I snickered a littke
jfactor! wrote:I know I'm going to catchfor this. LOL!!!
vintagefisher wrote:taken from the article -he was wearing bright colors while walking along a pedestrian pathway when he was hit.
the article also says he was hit from behind, implying they were going the same direction, how often are bikes allowed on a "pedestrian pathway" especially going 35mph. Plus it states that the cyclist lost control of his bike as well.
iamkickstand wrote:how in the world does a blind guy know he was wearing bright colors anyway?
iamkickstand wrote:I'm not hating, I'm asking a simple logical question.
b_b wrote: I can't imaging how someone could ram a pedestrian at 35mph unless they ran out from nowhere, which seems highly unlikely in this situation. I ride some paths myself and take full responsibility to avoid all others. When passing I slow and go off the path to give plenty of safety zone and to not startle them.
vintagefisher wrote:...
the article also says he was hit from behind, implying they were going the same direction, how often are bikes allowed on a "pedestrian pathway" especially going 35mph. Plus it states that the cyclist lost control of his bike as well.
Roy wrote:How can he win in court? He (Bernstein ) was ridding blind. He cannot say that he knew where on or off the road he was.
"Mr. Bernstein, you stated in case "Joe verse Bill" that ridding blind was reckless and stupid, how were you not reckless and stupid? ( and I bet the lawyers for the driver will have many other of his cases to use against him)
A blind ambulance chaser probably does not want to eat his or his fathers own words.
To bad, this could be an epic court battle between Detroit's best ambulance chasers and the best ambulance chasers of New York!
Who do you think has the best Ambulance Chassers??
Roy
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests